logo greentransport.eu

Car versus plane: travel and the climate change debate

Posted by Jan Prahm August 25th, 2010

Which is worse for global warming: travelling by car or by plane? According to the results of an EU-funded study, car travel increases global temperatures more than an air travel for the same journey but only in the long term. Travelling by plane, on the other hand, adversely affects short-lived warming processes at high altitudes. The findings are part of the QUANTIFY (‘Quantifying the climate impact of global and European transport systems’) project, which was funded EUR 8.39 million under the ‘Sustainable development, global change and ecosystems’ Thematic area of the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6).

To read the full text click here.

WWF UK Report: Travelling Light

Posted by Jan Prahm August 6th, 2010

Business flying plays an essential part in determining aviation’s future – it currently represents 25% of UK passenger trips and a much higher percentage of airline profitability.

Our research challenges the assumption that airport expansion is essential for business productivity, and lends support to WWF-UK’s campaign for companies to cut one in five business flights. This film explores report and One in Five challenge.

Background

Aviation is one of the fastest-growing sources of carbon emissions in the UK, rising annually at a rate of 3% and representing 13% of the climate change damage generated by the UK. Business flying represents 25% of UK passenger trips and a much higher percentage of airline profitability.

WWF-UK sought to understand how seriously businesses are taking the need to reduce their carbon footprint from travel, and their future flying intentions.

In January 2008, we commissioned an independent market research company, Critical Research, to undertake a survey of business travel practices among the FTSE 350 companies. Here is a taster of the findings in our report, Travelling Light:


Key findings

  • 62% of companies surveyed are already reducing their business travel footprint.
  • A further 24% of companies are currently developing plans to do so.
  • 89% of companies expect they will want to fly less over the next 10 years.
  • 85% of companies say that videoconferencing can help them reduce their flying.
  • 9% of companies believe that videoconferencing can improve their productivity.

These findings are very significant, not only because they challenge the assumption that airport expansion is essential for business productivity, but also because they lend support to WWF-UK’s latest campaign calling on companies to cut one in five business flights.

Watch the video about cutting business flights and the advantages of video conferencing click here.

Environmental groups defend European efforts to reduce aircraft emissions

Posted by Jan Prahm August 6th, 2010

Thursday, May 27, 2010
A transatlantic coalition of environmental groups today joined an action at the UK High Court to defend Europe’s right to tackle carbon emissions from foreign aircraft that visit Europe.
To read the full story please click here.